Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: aftecting procedure. are nonetheless characteristic features which make admiralty distinct pug unique body af Fur example maritime law protection seamen finds direct expression legal rules which i govern procedural questions of burden of proor and sufficiency 10 Tevidence Garrett Moore- McCormack 317 U.S 239. 63 246 (1942); Kosxick v. United Fruit Co. 365 731 886 (1961) The rules are no less applicable in state court because they impact and conflict with state procedural rules. See, Neety Marine, Inc. 530 So. 2d 1116. 1122-1123 (La. 1988), cert. denied 489 1080 109S 153(1989): Bennett y SedcoMaritime 520 So 21 894. 905 (La App 3d Cir. 1987}. In Garrett, this Court upheld the application of the admiralty burdenof: Fproof rule and overturned the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. wh ...
(.png)
